I’ve so far avoided making double posts about things I’ve written on the Roosh Forum which up until this week was the main source of my visitors along with a lot of Canadian dudes because of The Feminist Policewoman and Why Toronto is Hell for Men. My situation has changed however, there’s been a huge influx of readers from In Mala Fide and also a few from In Bona Fide who are missing out. So RVF members, forgive some dupe writing.
Basically, we’ve been having a discussion on how to identify sluts. One of many factors brought up was:
“Just plain attractive (hot girls fuck more)”
Somebody said this in response:
“I disagree… I would say less attractive girls have to compensate her looks by being slutty. ( In behaviour and during sex )”
No offence to anybody who agrees with the later assertation but it is total bullshit. To repeat what I’ve already said:
“There are a few girls who fuck out of insecurity with their looks, usually with cute faces but bodies on the thick side, this is not the norm though. Among my year level every girl who still hasn’t kissed a guy is no higher than a 5. Every girl who has had a threesome is at least a 7. Same with every girl whose ever fucked or sucked more than one dick in the same night and every girl who has kiddie porn of her floating around is at least a 7. Every girl who only dates guys in their early 20′s is at least an 8, as are all the girls who regularly go clubbing underage. The correlation is very strong.”
This all however depends on your definition of what a slut is. Is a girl that’s been passed around by two dozen men yet been hit on thousands in their life time sluttier than a girl who has 10 sexual partners out of 100 men who’ve hit on her? My answer is yes. All the negatives such as divorce rates, mental health issues and the like are correlated with the total number of sexual partners. Not what percentage of men who’ve tried to fuck her have succeeded. This is why hot girls are sluttier than plainer girls.

Hot and slutty.
Guys will fuck anything so ugly girls still shoot down plenty of guys. Girls lower down on the out of 10 scale are easier to game though, nobody will disagree with this. This does not change the fact that: Young women who subjectively have more attractive faces tend to have a greater number of sexual partners (Wiedermann & Hurst 1998). I have no doubt that the gap in sexual partner counts between 5′s and 8′s is very sizable. But why? It’s partly because plainer girls go out less at night. The quality of the girls is always higher at night then during your day game sets. Since going out more means more drinking and more opportunity to fuck, these girls just get fucked more. The other explanation is my own theory, I have no way to prove it but it’s just a hunch. Part of the reason why plain girls get fucked less is because the Alpha’s that they’re attracted to just don’t want to fuck them simply because they’re off fucking hotter girls.
Per their hypergamous nature, they’d rather be getting relatively less dick then have to stoop down to the level of getting fucked by beta dick. 6/7′s however still don’t take as much as dick do the 8/9′s, but we’d all say their easier to attract, right? A large part of why we see attractive but not highly attractive girls as being easier is because 8′s and 9′s make a small percentage of the female population and this is made worse by the fat epidemic. The main reason why you’re getting a lot more 6′s then you are 8′s is because of their smaller size of the female population. This doesn’t explain the whole story however, a 7 IS easier to swoop than an 8 but they’ve still had fewer dicks inside them. How does that work?

The correlation between unattractiveness and taking less dick also extends to lesbians.
8′s and 9′s are getting passed around, pumped and dumped by a small pool of men such as the bloggers under the Evil Patriarchy link category to the right. Even f0r those men however most of their lays comes from 6′s and 7′s because of the sizes of the two groups respective populations. If 8′s and above make say 10% of the female population they might be 25% of the top tier mens lays for example. The combination of being more social, drinking more, being more confident in general and being hit on by far more guys means in absolute terms 8′s and 9′s have been fucked more than the 7′s. All this extra attention makes these hotties more selective in who they fuck (and how Alpha they are) but because they have a far larger pool of suitors they’ve been fucked more. Plainer girls however fuck a relatively higher percentage of the guys that hit on them but the number of guys who hit on them is significantly less, leaving them with a lower overall notch count.
The reason the 9′s are harder for everyone reading this to attract then the 6′s is because the former make us insecure about our game. We feel less confident when we approach them and when we talk to them. We put them on the pedestal. You feel less Alpha when you’re gaming a very attractive girl, and if you FEEL less Alpha then you ARE less Alpha.
The world Alpha can be swapped with confident or charismatic, it’s all the same thing. It’s all relative too, it’s a scale not a black and white dichotomy.
In conclusion: The girls who have done the nastiest shit, had more cocks and all the mental and marital issues associated with it are on the whole a lot more attractive than the girls who haven’t been put on the spit roast or have had nudes circulating the internet from when they were 16. There are exceptions but in general this is the case. Think about all of the girls that you consider sluts and how attractive they are out of 10. In the West the average girl is a 5 in my humble opinion and the average slut is a 7. From “unattractive but not ugly” to “cute face+ nice body: would give any straight man a boner” is a wider chasm then the 2 point difference would lead you to believe.
This song always makes me sad for being born in era where it is impossible to find a commitment worthy woman who is actually attractive in the West. An era where it is impossible to raise a daughter who will grow up to be a real woman and not a attention whoring, drunkard, cum guzzling, mentally unstable and prescription medicated she-male. It’s a very good thing that I on my clock I have 20 years to figure something out. I do want to raise a family one day, a large one. Even then I doubt I’d sign a marriage agreement.
Until next time.

In most cases in the Western world it takes effort to be ‘hot’. IE not eating junk food, not wearing flip flops and t-shirts, all the things that lazy-ass Western girls struggle with. If she puts in the effort to be hot, it’s because her little brain has learned that this efforts nets her attention. Attention from attractive guys, girl brain goes “ohhh shiny”, girl gets fucked. A lot.
It’s like saying ‘a BMW is expensive’. Hot = slutty. It’s redundant
Not every thin girl is hot. Not EVERY hot girl is a slut, if they were the “manosphere” wouldn’t exist. Your argument falls apart because the majority of thin girls out there are born with plain or ugly faces or unattractive bodies without being even being fat. Unless you live in Russia or something, what you’re saying makes zero sense.
These are all outstanding observations. It helps explain why Roissy sees so many good looking man – average looking woman long-term relationships. The alpha is selecting for low-count.
Also, average looking girls have an incentive to be extremely picky since their sexual purity is all they have to offer alpha males.
Pingback: The Two Main Types of Sluts « Starting Young & Aiming High